I like the idea.
That would be cool to have some sort of a rating system like this.
There are a few hurdles for this to work.
This would have to be for public leagues only as we have our own rules for private leagues(user created). So there would have to be a filter put in place somehow.
We all know about the almighty knuckleheads that do the multi account deal. So an IP address would have to be figured in somehow.(automatically)
One other thing off the top of my head is, what factors would be taken into account for these ratings?
Wins and losses ya.
You'd have to add strength of field or W/L won't matter.
Can't really use seniority. Just because a guy has been here 2+ yrs doesn't mean he's good at it and just because a guys been here a month doesn't mean he's not picked it up either.
A GM can win a league championship by putting his team in cap **** then leave right after to join another league and do it all again and again. So maybe some sort of cap rating would be needed.
There's prolly stuff I'm overlooking. This game is a challenging one no doubt and the right factors in the right portions would have to be in place and tested.
But on the face it's a great idea. Most gamers love the ladder system. We all love that sense of accomplishment and the next challenge when you move up.
A good topic to kick around in more depth.