Gustoon wrote:
-1
Sorry but I like the way this game works and still has the element of chance left in it, if we end up micro-managing every aspect of the game it will kill what originally drew us here in the first place.
What next , design our own players?
I agree with you Gus!
PLUS:
Playing the game is not enough, for most. There are some who screwed up any semblance of fair play when they made trades for draft picks for the first two seasons amongst themselves and others for players that have since been re-tooled in their ratings to be more lifelike in their ratings. And Yes, the player ratings have changed, pretty drastically. Thus not nearly the amount of "Superstars" as in the beginning of this great game.
Until these STEROID-ed players are removed from those that exploited this oversight, the same teams will dominate the leagues that exists now. Just as they are now.
You know who you are and we know who you are. You know what you did. After you get your teams assembled, just complain about the ranking system and fix it so no one else can get players as good as yours. I believe this has happened already.
It's a **** shame we are looking to limit trading now, because a few take advantage of an oversight of the designers of the game in the player ratings system.
We all recognized it needed fixed, too bad, the wolves got there first, then cried for revisions to the rating system, after the trading deeds was done. Is that NOT the way it went??
Please correct me if I'm wrong! And explain, please?