setherick wrote:
blackflys wrote:
There's nothing wrong with those plays. That's a lot more then some teams use. It's not the zero that is shocking it's the 106
Oakland passes 70 times a game and you ran a 4-3 on 95 percent of his passes. Teams can't stop them in dime with real CBs , you have cbs with 25 rating. Results in Inflation of stats
I always wonder how some people look at this. For instance, I reevaluate my defensive calls game-by-game and set a defensive game plan for each opponent. So some games it looks like I exclusively call one or two defensive plays, but that's because they are designed to shut down what my opponent does.
Totally understandable , this zags meant for,the Pitt- Denver gsme. But if you only call two plays its because your bar on formation or play is not even and it calls the one with the higher percentage more. If you make it even and have the same type of plays that wont happen.
Coaches like grandad found a group of five unstoppable,plays when called over and over your gonna have success enough to be able to dominate . What he did was study plays that are hard to stop in the gqme logs and built his offense with theseplqys. Same thing on defense. And he controls too teams ,in a league. He says it's his grandson but so many obvious things that prove its mainly him' His grandson is involved but he tells him what to do or ive gotten messages fron his grandson and it Was GDad he even admitted its. I've have messaged him over 200 times on my outlook ad rstings and gameplanning ' bad move by me''
..
either way it's bush league
